
 
		geoning character-development and ethics 
 education movement, such extraordinary  
 ethical collapse has taken hold  
 across a wide swath of families at the top  
 of the economic and social strata in the  
 United States and around the world? 
 Yael Kidron, who runs the Character  
 Education program at the Markkula Center  
 suggests that there is a crisis of values  
 at work. “What constitutes ‘the good life,’  
 and what constitutes success in life?” she  
 asks. The parents at the heart of the scandal  
 “got off track, they didn’t have a clear  
 and ethical image of what it is to live the  
 good life, live with integrity and strive to  
 be the best person you can be.”  
 Kindness. Honesty. A sense of justice  
 and responsibility: Kidron says these  
 authentic values both require and foster  
 “a true sense of your moral self.”  
 The flip side of that, she says, is a  
 “twisted view of what constitutes success,” 
  in which end goals and “externally  
 dictated standards” guide decisions,  
 rather than one’s own moral compass.  
 “It’s the right of those kids, whose  
 parents  lied on  their behalf,  to  be accepted  
 as who they are,” Kidron says.  
 “What the parents really violated is  
 their obligation to help the children  
 reach their  full potential,  and guide  
 them as role models, as good and ethical  
 people who accept the children for  
 who they are and want to be.”  
 Kidron notes the metaphors that  
 made the ethical breaches easier to  
 swallow—taking the “side door,” using  
 “the VIP entrance.” Accepting such usages  
 amounts to a violation a parent’s  
 duty—to  acknowledge  that  there  are  
 real stresses in the world, that we don’t  
 always get to have the things we want,  
 and that experiencing failure, both the  
 potential of it and the reality, is part  
 of building character and a lifetime of  
 personal integrity.  
 For Sheri Glucoft Wong, the dilemma  
 starts  with “misguided  but caring  
 parents who are paying more attention  
 to form than essence; to performance  
 versus their kids’ development.  
 These parents, she says, “misunderstand  
 what’s important to a child’s or  
 person’s well-being, they’re just looking  
 at performance,” rather than the real  
 needs of a child to grow through experience, 
  struggle—and failure.  
 “Short-term stress helps brains develop,” 
  she says, whereas research shows entitlement  
 in childhood and high marks  
 on an academic transcript are not necessarily  
 predictors for happiness and success  
 in school and life. This has borne  
 out in her own experience as a consultant  
 to schools where competitive academics  
 were prioritized, but social and  
 emotional learning lacked attention.  
 School administrators “could see the  
 drawbacks,” she said, including a “culture  
 of meanness” and a “lack of compassion  
 not just in the school culture, but in the  
 culture of the families.” Glucoft Wong  
 says that a reasonably reliable predictor  
 of a child’s success in school and beyond  
 has been the development of character  
 qualities such as cooperation, collaboration, 
  compassion and caring.  
 Jorgenson says that college-prep high  
 schools, and the colleges themselves, are  
 all too often “accomplices” in subverting  
 values, putting performance before  
 personal growth. 
 “When we condition children to believe  
 that their self-worth is dependent  
 on their next accomplishment,” he says,  
 “we condemn them to a lifetime of unfulfillment.” 
 As a school administrator, part of his  
 job is to temper the  “unrealistic expectations  
 that produce a toxic culture.” 
 “I am working with parents,” he said,  
 “in  support  of  their  struggles  with  the  
 stress they face from massive peer pressure  
 surrounding ‘achievement’ in all of  
 its forms.”  
 At the Markkula Center, Yael Kidron  
 said that those pressures continue to  
 persist—and that succumbing to them  
 comes with a high cost. “You will always  
 be facing situations where you will  
 be tempted to make bad choices. Those  
 ‘side door’ parents crossed a line, and  
 not just because they committed a deep  
 social injustice. They took away their  
 kids’ freedom of choice.” 
 “The parent’s dream  is imposed on  
 them,” continues Kidron. “It’s a violation  
 not just of the law, but also their  
 children’s basic right to be respected for  
 who they are and who they want to be,  
 and figure out their successes their own  
 way. This is what leads to healthy and  
 thriving society. You don’t have to go  
 to an Ivy League college to succeed.” n 
 "Schools  
 are starting  
 to think  
 about  
 playground  
 staff as  
 educators,  
 and about  
 free play as  
 part of the  
 educational  
 experience" 
 August/September 2019     53 
 SHUTTERSTOCK